A wintry mess before the very wet and milder arrives next week?

So as we mentioned in our previous blog post, we are expecting to finally break out of this latest cold and dry weather pattern by early next week. So what is going to be responsible for this change? Here is a look at the current weather maps which are supported by what we see on satellite (a good sign if we want to follow a particular weather model):

500 mb map (left) with Integrated Vapor Transport (shows atmospheric rivers denoted by bright colors). Water vapor satellite imagery  on right. 

The most noticeable things on the left chart are the large high pressure ridge centered over the Inland Northwest (Large H) as well as the atmospheric river developing north and west of Hawaii. Over the next several days we expect the presence of the high to persist over our area. This means more fog, low clouds, and very cold temperatures in the valleys with light winds. This is because high pressure systems in the winter typically lead to strong inversions (temperature increasing with height). This is especially true when there is widespread snow cover over an area and clearing skies. This is certainly the case right now as we have seen many mornings recently with sub-zero temperatures and mainly clear skies. Here is a look at just how strong the inversion was this morning at our office.

1/14/17 4am weather sounding at NWS Spokane. The red line shows how the temperature varied with elevation. The farther to the right the red line is the warmer the atmosphere is. Notice how the temperature increases all the way from the ground up to 4700'. That is what we would call a strong inversion. 

So why are we telling you about this inversion? Because what happens between now and Monday night will be critical into producing an accurate weather forecast. But more on that later. So first, what do we expect to happen to that atmospheric river forming north of Hawaii? By Monday night here is what most of the weather models are showing.

Atmospheric river position 10 pm Monday 1/16/17

According to this we should see the ridge being rapidly replaced by the atmospheric river moving in from the Pacific. Not only is this air stream moist, but it will be warm as well. So that should mean we would see a rapid transition from the current chilly air mass to a much milder one, right?. In other words we should see any threat of snow changing to rain and probably in a short amount of time. But if only it were that easy! This upcoming system will likely provide us with all sorts of weather conundrums simply based on the inversions we showed you earlier.   Here is an example from Moses Lake.

Weather Sounding from Moses Lake 4am Tuesday with the freezing line denoted in pink.

So as the precipitation arrives it could begin as all snow as the entire atmosphere will have temperatures below freezing. But as the atmospheric river comes into the area (being ushered in by southwest winds of 30-40 mph 3000-10,000 ft above the ground) the temperatures above the ground will warm faster than those near the ground and this will create what we call a melting layer or warm nose of air aloft. What this means is any snow which forms in upper portions of the atmosphere will melt as it traverses the melting layer. If the melting layer is deep enough it will melt anything which falls into it. If it's not deep enough it will only partially melt the snow falling into it. In this case we are looking at a melting layer around 4000-5000' thick which should be plenty deep to melt most of the snow falling through it. That's not the whole equation though. What happens after that depends on how deep the freezing layer near the ground is. For the sounding above the freezing air near the ground is around 1500' thick so the question is "is this deep enough to completely freeze what melted before hitting the ground"? If the answer is yes the melted snow would completely refreeze producing sleet or ice pellets. If its not deep enough the melted snow will not refreeze and instead fall as a very cold rain which can easily refreeze once it contact a sub-freezing object on the ground. Here is a nice weather schematic the NWS office in Omaha created that shows the complexity of forecasting winter weather precipitation types.

So what does the profile in the Moses Lake sounding favor? That is always a tough question to answer as any perturbation in the strength/depth of the above ground melting layer and near ground freezing layer has a direct impact on the precipitation type.  If nothing were to change in the models we think this would lead to freezing rain. However the no change argument isn't one that often appears as much as we would desire. Since this event is still a few days away there are numerous answers as to what might occur. While we are confident we will see precipitation, we are far less confident in what the prevailing type of precipitation will consist of. Each model is advertising a different scenario. When we see such great differences we sometimes like to defer to what we call an ensemble model solution. This is were we take the same initial model and introduce very small changes at the very beginning of the run. These small initial changes can lead to vastly different solutions as you get farther into the forecast. So here is a snapshot of the various precipitation chances associated with the incoming weather make during the Tuesday morning commute.

4-panel ensemble solution for the precipitation type on Tuesday morning. Upper left corner=Sleet chance, upper right=Snow chance, lower left=freezing rain chances, lower right=measurable precipitation chances

The image above is about as messy as a weather forecast can get around here. As for sleet or ice pellets (upper left), we'd expect to see the best chances to occur over the western Columbia Basin and into the northern valleys east of Omak. The snow chances (upper right panel) would be highest near the north Cascades, northeast Washington, and over the northern Panhandle. Meanwhile the threat of freezing rain looks most prevalent over the remainder of the the Inland Northwest. But that is what the latest ensemble model runs suggest and this could change significantly as the event nears. Previously we were expecting to see a lot more snow with a brief changeover to freezing rain and then all rain. If we see snow first the freezing rain impacts could be somewhat mitigated as freezing rain falling onto fresh snow has much less impact on driving conditions then freezing rain falling onto bare pavement. Stay tuned to the latest changes in this evolving portion of the forecast.

Eventually (how long is uncertain) the atmospheric river will bring the warm moist over the entire region and mix it down to the ground with the most of the snow or freezing rain chances remaining near the north Cascades or over the far northern valleys. Here is what the temperature profile looks like for Moses Lake at 10 am Tuesday. Notice it's entirely above freezing which means we would see all rain.

10am Tuesday temperature profile for Moses Lake

Once the lower atmosphere warms above freezing we expect it to remain above freezing through the end of the event.The end of the event will likely consist of a good amount of time as the atmospheric river remains fixed over the area. Here is the expected position on Wednesday afternoon and then on Thursday.

Atmospheric River position on Wednesday 1/18/19 4pm.

Atmospheric river position by Thursday morning 1/19/17

That means the atmospheric river will be over the region beginning Monday night and persisting into early Thursday. Needless to say that can result in a lot of precipitation. Just how much are we expecting? Here are four distinct model runs.

72 hour precipitation ending 4 pm Thursday

Surprisingly there is very good agreement for a forecast this far out. We are quite confident that the precipitation over the western Columbia Basin and in the lee of the Cascades is a little bit overdone, and near the Cascade Crest and over north Idaho it might be underdone. Nonetheless these are some very impressive precipitation amounts. Looks like the eastern third of Washington and the Idaho Panhandle should generally see anywhere from 1.50"-3.00 inches. If there were no snow on the ground this alone could produce some issues with low-land flooding and perhaps some ice jam flooding as the ice breaks up on area rivers. However that is not the case as we have an appreciable amount of snow on the ground. Here is a look at the approximate amount of water tied up in the snow pack.

That is quite a bit of water or potential runoff sitting on the ground and will only add to the runoff totals. Based on the forecast temperatures, we expect to see temperatures remaining above freezing from Tuesday through much of Thursday (including nighttime low temperatures). The above freezing temperatures will combine with breezy winds resulting in a great setup for appreciable melting. The best melting potential will occur the SE third of our forecast area with the least amount near the Cascades and far northern valleys. We still expect to see most if not all the snow to melt over the Palouse, LC Valley, and eastern Columbia Basin. So combining the expected rainfall with the water from the snow melt could equate to up to 2.50 to nearly 5.00 inches of water which could potentially runoff. This increases the odds for flooding appreciably. Here is a map of where we anticipate the greatest flooding problems to occur.

We expect most of the flooding issues will involve low-land flooding, ice jam flooding, and urban flooding (think snow clogged storm drains...clear them now if you can!). Small rivers and streams could also flood, especially over the Palouse and nearby areas. As of now we are not expecting any mainstem flooding, however that could change especially if we melt more snow than expected.

If we look into the longer range weather forecasts, we don't expect to totally dry out, but we will cool considerably. Not down to current levels, but certainly enough to refreeze what doesn't melt. The pristine snow cover we have over us will look completely different by next Friday and could feature hard snowpack and frozen slush.

Please stay tuned to the latest forecasts for this upcoming situation...it will likely be a messy situation and is certainly subject to change. Oh yes...the countdown to spring is now 64 days and counting.

Severe Weather Tomorrow??? It's a Possibility.

We have all heard of the calm before the storm, today could be just another chapter in that book. This afternoon will feature highs in the 70's and 80's under mostly sunny skies. Come tomorrow the chance for showers and thunderstorms will be on the rise as an area of low pressure approaches the Inland Northwest. Temperatures will continue on the warm side of normal, but increased moisture will push ahead of the low pressure center increasing our chances for convective activity or thunderstorms. In this post we will evaluate the chances for thunder around the region and the potential timing through various weather maps and products.

So lets start out with today and move forward from there. Our current pattern has a ridge of high pressure directly over the Inland Northwest keeping conditions calm and pleasant. The ridge also allows for warm southwesterly flow to advect into our area bringing above normal temperatures today. We will take a look at the current set up in the following image.

 11am PDT Infared satellite map with 500mb heights

From the image we can see the area of low pressure to our west and the current ridge over us. The ridge is also diverting much of the cloud cover to our north. As the low slowly moves onshore the ridge will continue to be shifted to the east allowing clouds to move east of the Cascades. Not only will this bring increased cloud cover for tomorrow afternoon, but also increased moisture through the atmospheric column allowing better instability. So lets take a look at the increased moisture moving in. This can be accomplished in a couple of manners, but we will look at Precipitable Water or PWATs in the atmospheric column.

Precipitable Water values from 11am today (left image) and 5pm Thursday (right image)

The images above show the increase in atmospheric moisture from today to tomorrow from the North American Model (NAM). For much of the Inland NW we will see an increase of nearly a quarter of an inch of precipitable water. Another method to address the amount of moisture would be the change in forecast soundings which show temperature and dewpoints up through the atmosphere. Next we will examine the forecast soundings to see the change in moisture from today to tomorrow.

NAM forecast soundings from 2pm today (left image) and 2pm Thursday (right image)

From the sounding you can see the major differences in the amount of moisture present. The red line would indicate the temperatures and the green indicates the dewpoint which reflects the amount of moisture in the atmosphere. For the left image a dry layer is noted around 500mb (where the green line moves away from the red) whereas for tomorrow (right image) much more moisture is present (green and red lines are closer throughout the image). So from these two examples the change in moisture can easily be noted, but will we have the instability to promote the thunderstorms? We will now at these parameters that promote thunderstorms.

For thunderstorms to occur, many things need to be present including lift (forcing), moisture and instability (atmospheric stability). We will first look at the lift for the area and the one way to do this is to compare from today's conditions to tomorrow. Below is an image looking at the Q vector convergence in the upper atmosphere or Div-Q. Div-Q is a generalized way to assess the lifting potential in a portion of the atmosphere.

Upper level Div Q from 11am today (left image) and 5pm Thursday (right image)

From comparing the images we can see the major differences concerning forcing. Tomorrow the low will move onshore bringing a good amount of forcing ultimately aiding in thunderstorm development. With the right image being for 5pm tomorrow, we will most likely be looking at a case that will unfold more in the late afternoon and evening hours rather than early in the afternoon. Would this be a good or a bad thing with it unfolding in the evening? For now it looks good. We have been hitting our high temperatures in the late afternoon/early evening which would be the best time for the stronger storms, so this would also would aid in thunderstorm development. We have already looked at the moisture profiles for the area and have concluded that higher amounts of moisture will be in place. Finally we will look at one of the convective parameters that are normally consulted to address thunderstorm potentials which is CAPE or the Convective Available Potential Energy. First we will once again look at the NAM model. It has been the most aggressive when it comes to CAPE values, but paints a similar picture to the others as to the areas with the best chances for seeing thunderstorms.

NAM CAPE values for 5pm Thursday

From the NAM we can see a broad area with values surpassing 1000J/kg and localized areas greater than 1500J/kg (blue and green shading). If you remember around a week ago on the afternoon of June 3rd we had thunderstorms for much of the area. These storms were also working with around 1000J/kg of CAPE. With the NAM being on the upper end of model perspective lets take a look at another one. Next we will examine the model often used by the Storm Prediction Center (SPC) in Norman, OK which is the SREF or the Short Range Ensemble Forecast.

SREF CAPE values for 5pm tomorrow

Although not as colorful as the NAM, the SREF is also showing higher values for eastern Washington and into the Idaho Panhandle. It also has peak values in the 1000J/kg to 1250J/kg range. So we do have some consistency among short range models of the potential for higher amounts of CAPE. So with all of this in mind, now comes the million dollar? will we see thunderstorms and if so, how strong will they be? Concerning the chance for thunderstorms, it is a given. We will see thunderstorms tomorrow. The next question is where? As we can see, the best forcing will be in the eastern third of Washington and the Idaho Panhandle so these are the locations with the best chances. We do not want to omit the chance for the east slopes of the Cascades or the Basin, but the threat will not be as great as the other locations. From the SPC, they create a calibrated outlook of the thunderstorm chances for a location so lets take a look at what they think.

SPC calibrated thunderstorm probabilities between 5am-5pm Thursday

So from the SPC, they highlight a 40% chance for much of northeast Washington into the Idaho Panhandle.  These are some of the higher values I have seen from this for our area so it would lead me to think the chance for thunderstorms is essentially a slam dunk.  Finally the big one.....will any of the storms be severe? Here at the office we seem to think the potential is definitely there for strong storms. Comparing to last week, we had similar CAPE values, but tomorrow we actually have better dynamics to support storms. The SPC also does a product for the chances of severe storms and here it is.

SPC severe thunderstorm probabilities for 5pm Thursday

While the chances for severe storms do not look very high, they still highlight the potential for portions of the area. This product usually only has slight chances for us when severe events do occur, so the potential is there. The region will want to keep an eye on the skies tomorrow as active weather looks to be a given.

How long can this stagnant weather go on?

By now, most of you may be getting tired of our boring, foggy weather.  On the positive side, you haven't had to shovel any snow, and the roads have been in decent shape, except for some occasional icy spots from freezing drizzle.  But the gray skies do tend to wear on some folks.  Here's what it looks like from space.

Visible Satellite 1/23/14

That white area in the middle of the picture is the fog and stratus that has filled in the Columbia Basin of eastern Washington and north-central Oregon.  You can see some mountains above the fog near the Washington/BC border, as well as the Washington Cascades.

Why are we stuck in this pattern?  High pressure over the western US is steering storms away from our area.  As we've discussed in past blogs, this is causing a severe drought in the western US.  But for many in the West, they're enjoying sunshine and warmth.  Take a look at this satellite image to see what we mean:

Western US Visible Satellite picture 1/23/14

So why are we so cloudy while the rest of the West is sunny?  Professor Cliff Mass of the University of Washington wrote about this in his blog.  You can find it at:  http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2014/01/cloud-bowl-of-eastern-washington.html  We highly recommend it.

But in short, the reason is three-fold.  First, the Columbia Basin acts as a topographic bowl.

 The Columbia Basin is bordered by the Cascades to the west, the Selkirks to the north, the Panhandle mountains to the east, and the central-Oregon mountains to the south.    A perfect bowl.  Note in the above picture of the western US, the Central Valley of California also provides a nice elongated topographic bowl.

Second, you need moisture in order to form fog.  And while we have been very dry, we still have had weather systems providing some moisture.  Coupled with the cold nights, and you get fog and stratus to form.  The Central Valley of California has been so dry this winter, they can't even produce fog! 

The third ingredient is a lid to put on the bowl of fog, to prevent it from going anywhere.  This is provided by the ridge of high pressure.  High pressure results in sinking air.  Sinking air warms. So while at the surface we're stuck in cold, sub-freezing temperatures, the air above us is much warmer.  Locations in the mountains as high as 5000-6500'' have been reaching the mid-40s each day.   The high pressure also keeps storms away from our area.  Storms mean wind, and wind mixes the air which dissipates fog. Below is a temperature and moisture sounding or profile taken at our office on 1/23 at 3 pm. There are two pink lines on this chart, the one on the right denotes how the temperature changes with height. The line on the left is the moisture profile. The farther away the two lines are from one another, the drier the air.  So on this sounding, most of the atmosphere is clear and dry. The exception is near the ground where our temperatures have been stuck in the mid 20s to lower 30s for days and the sun has been a rather rare site. Notice how the temperature increases with height and peaks at 47° at an elevation around 6500'. So if you seeking sun and warmth, the mountains are the place to go. 

Spokane temperature sounding 3pm Thursday. Light pink line or right denotes the temperature profile. 

One positive of this weather has been the beautiful natural flocking which has adorned most of the objects stuck in fog for the past week. This flocking is being produced from the deposition of small sub-freezing water droplets on objects resulting in riming. The rime in this event is covering everything from trees, fences and power lines.  We wrote about this back in December.  You can read about it at: http://inlandnorthwestweather.blogspot.com/2013/12/another-kind-of-white-weather.html  

Here's some pictures from our office:

So this kind of weather can't last forever, can it?  No, but it can last for a few weeks.  This episode started on January 16th, and today is the 24th.  Yep, it's only been going on for a week.  Seems like a month though.  Have we seen longer episodes in the past?  Of course.  One of them occurred during the 1976/77 drought.  After a few storms brought rain and snow to the area in the middle of January 1977, a huge area of high pressure developed over the area, just like our current episode.  Spokane and the Inland NW were stuck in the fog from the 19th of January through February 10th.  That's 22 days!  Although there were a few peaks of bright sunshine during that streak they quite brief.  A weak weather system moved through at the start of February, but it was too weak to get rid of the fog.  Instead, they had some freezing rain.

How long will our current episode last?  Aside from a few possible sun breaks, we're likely stuck in the fog through the weekend and into early next week.  There's a outside chance that some locations in the Panhandle and northeast Washington will see more sun on Monday.  This is due to an arctic high pressure system centered over eastern Montana and the Dakotas that may push a bit of drier air into our area from the east.

7am 1/27/14 precipitation and sea-level pressure forecast from GFS model. 

Despite the presence of the weak system notice the 500 mb ridge (below) remains very amplified and basically centered over the Pacific Northwest. 

500 mb pattern for 7am 1/27/14  GFS model.

Starting on Tuesday, some very weak Pacific weather fronts might be able to break up the low clouds as well as bring us a dusting of snow as the ridge gets progressively weaker each day.   By the end of next week, there is more confidence that the weather pattern will have changed and we can get a respite from the fog and low clouds.

4am 1/28/14 500 mb map from GFS.
Ridge gets flattened a little by weak front. 

7am 1/30/14 500 mb map from GFS.
Ridge is virtually gone now over PacNW and is replaced by a trough off the coast. 

And this ridge breakdown could actually persist for more than a couple days. The map below is the mean 500 mb pattern projected for the period from January 30th-February 3rd. Notice the ridge has generally shifted into western Alaska and has left a broader trough over most of the US, including our area. The 8-14 day outlook (bottom image) through February 7th looks similar as well. 

6-10 day outlook. Mean 500 mb map. 

8-14 day outlook., Mean 500 mb map